- Bigger Table
- Posts
- Canada Pushes Back on US Arms: Joins Europe’s Plan
Canada Pushes Back on US Arms: Joins Europe’s Plan
A Bold Shift to ReArm Europe for Canada’s Defense

🇨🇦 Canada Pushes Back: Standing Up to Trump’s Bullying and Building a Smarter Defense Future
🚀 A Strong Intro: Canada’s Stand for Sovereignty
When former U.S. President Donald Trump barked orders for more spending on American-made weapons, Canada was listening—but not bowing down. Now, with Prime Minister Mark Carney at the helm, Canada is sending a loud and clear message: “We’re charting our own course.”
This isn’t just about buying more tanks or jets—it’s about sovereignty, strategy, and self-reliance. Carney’s push to join ReArm Europe (now known as Readiness 2030) and invest in Canada’s own defense industries is a direct response to Trump’s bullying. For decades, Canada’s defense spending has been dominated by U.S. contractors, but Carney’s approach is flipping the script—prioritizing Canadian jobs, European partnerships, and a balanced military strategy.
Trump’s threats to pull out of NATO, trade wars, and demands for “America First” defense deals have forced Canada to rethink its role. Now, Canada is building a defense policy that’s about Canadian interests first—not American profits.

🔑 Key Takeaways:
🟢 Carney’s Bold Stance: Canada’s Prime Minister is diversifying defense spending—shifting away from U.S. contractors and investing in European and domestic capabilities.
🟢 Joining ReArm Europe: Canada plans to join the €800 billion ReArm Europe initiative by July 1, 2025, strengthening alliances with European partners and reducing dependency on U.S. suppliers.
🟢 A Commitment to NATO: Canada is doubling down on NATO’s 2% GDP spending target by 2030—but on Canada’s terms, not Trump’s demands.
🟢 Historic Echoes: This pivot mirrors past moments in Canadian history—like the Avro Arrow project of the 1950s, when Canada tried to build its own fighter jet, or the decision to stay out of the U.S.-led Iraq War in 2003. It’s about standing tall in the face of foreign pressure.
🟢 A Sovereign Path: Carney’s plan puts Canadian jobs, Canadian security, and Canadian values first—pushing back against years of American dominance in defense spending.

🏗️ A Deep Dive: Canada’s Pivot to Defense Independence
For decades, Canada’s defense spending has been dominated by U.S. contractors—almost 75% of all Canadian defense capital goes south of the border. That’s billions of Canadian tax dollars padding the pockets of American weapons makers. But under Carney, that’s about to change.
Carney’s message is simple: “That’s not smart.” Instead of handing over blank checks to American defense giants, he’s pivoting to European defense cooperation and domestic industry growth. And it’s not just talk—Carney’s team is reviewing the $13.29 billion contract for 88 F-35 fighter jets from the U.S., exploring whether European or domestic alternatives might be more cost-effective and better for Canadian jobs.
Carney’s pivot isn’t a tantrum—it’s a carefully calculated shift. Faced with an unpredictable U.S. ally and growing European military initiatives, Canada is hedging its bets. This is about diversification—ensuring Canada’s security isn’t hostage to America’s political drama.

🌍 The ReArm Europe Plan: What’s in It for Canada?
Let’s be clear: ReArm Europe—or as it’s now known, Readiness 2030—isn’t just some fancy EU brainstorm. It’s a €800 billion war chest to boost Europe’s defense capacity, strengthen alliances, and shake off U.S. defense dependence. And Canada wants in by July 1, 2025.
So, what’s Canada’s play here?
🟢 Diversification: By joining ReArm Europe, Canada can access a broader range of European-made defense tech—not just U.S.-branded missiles and aircraft.
🟢 New Markets, New Friends: This opens doors for Canadian firms to supply parts, tech, and know-how—and forge new partnerships that don’t rely on Trump’s mood swings.
🟢 NATO’s 2%—on Canada’s Terms: Carney is fully committed to hitting that 2% of GDP defense spending target—but he’s making sure that money benefits Canada and Europe, not just Lockheed Martin’s shareholders.
🟢 A Future-Proof Military: ReArm Europe is all about joint procurement and modernized infrastructure. It’s a chance for Canada to be part of a broader, smarter defense ecosystem that doesn’t dance to America’s tune.
Carney’s approach is rooted in history. It’s not the first time Canada has said “no thanks” to U.S. pressure: in the 1950s, we tried to build our own Avro Arrow jet instead of buying American; in 2003, we refused to join the Iraq War despite Washington’s saber-rattling. This is the latest chapter—Canada’s pivot to smarter, more sovereign defense spending.
Tired of all the bad news?Me too! That’s why I recommend this newspaper! You’ll receive a copy in your mailbox each month filled with hopeful news and do-good action ideas. The Goodnewspaper is a physical newspaper, released monthly, fighting against a world full of hate by celebrating the people, ideas, and movements that are changing the world. It’s the perfect gift to brighten someone’s month all year long. 👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 |

📜 Historic Echoes: Canada’s Tradition of Defiant Defense Choices
Carney’s pivot to ReArm Europe isn’t a wild swing. It’s part of a long Canadian tradition: telling the world’s biggest bully to take a seat while we figure out our own way forward.
🛩️ The Avro Arrow: A Vision Too Bold for Uncle Sam
Back in the 1950s, Canada dreamed of soaring high with the Avro Arrow—a cutting-edge, Canadian-designed fighter jet that could have outflown anything in the sky. But when the U.S. pushed for cheaper, American-made interceptors, Ottawa scrapped the project. Decades later, the Arrow still symbolizes Canadian innovation stifled by U.S. pressure.
🚫 The Iraq War Snub: Canada Says No
In 2003, when George W. Bush was busy convincing the world that Iraq was an existential threat (spoiler alert: it wasn’t), Canada said “thanks, but no thanks.” Despite the U.S.’s push for an all-in invasion, Canada stayed out, prioritizing diplomacy and multilateralism over American bravado.
🇨🇦 A Pattern of Independence
Carney’s move to diversify defense spending and align more closely with Europe is in lockstep with these past pivots. It’s about staying true to Canadian interests—not just playing junior partner to a U.S. defense juggernaut.
Just like the Arrow and the Iraq War, this pivot to ReArm Europe is about putting Canada first—its industries, its people, and its place in the world.
Pro-Tip: Newsletters don’t belong in the ‘inbox’! They deserve a space to call their own!
The best new app for newsletter reading.
Meco is a distraction-free space for reading newsletters outside the inbox. The app has features designed to supercharge your learnings from your favorite writers. Become a more productive reader and reduce the noise with Meco - try the app today!
🎯 Conclusion: A Smarter, Bolder Path Forward
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s shift toward ReArm Europe and away from American contractors isn’t just a policy tweak—it’s a bold statement of Canadian independence and future-focused defense.
With echoes of the Avro Arrow and the Iraq War decision, this move tells the world that Canada won’t be bullied into bad deals or forced to fund America’s military machine at the expense of our own economy and security. Instead, Carney is putting Canadian jobs, alliances, and sovereignty first, while still honoring Canada’s role in NATO and global security.
In an era of shifting alliances and growing uncertainty, Canada is choosing to stand tall, diversify its partnerships, and build a stronger, smarter defense posture—one that works for Canadians, not for Washington’s bottom line.
💬 We’d Love to Hear From You!
What do you think about Canada’s pivot to ReArm Europe and away from U.S. defense dependence? Do you see this as a bold step forward or just another chapter in Canada’s push for sovereignty? Share your thoughts in the comments below—we’re all about expanding the conversation!

The Man Who United Canada
✉️ Enjoyed this post?
Subscribe to the Bigger Table newsletter to stay in the loop on progressive politics, fresh perspectives, and real conversations about how Canada can lead with independence and innovation. Let’s build a bigger, bolder, and better table—together.